i would argue that naming cage as a co-composer for his silent piece
wasn't a very bright thing to do -- in essence, he was asking for it.
>their arguments seem pretty sound to me. this newton guy appears to
>be pretty greedy.
>
>also recently the guy who was sued by the cage estate settled for
>six figures acting like it was a donation. i'm not sure what to
>make of that one. he could have easily argued his silence was a
>parody of cage's silence.
>
>philo
>
>http://detritus.net/illegalart/
>
>
>>beastie boys' response to newton sampling lawsuit.
>>
>>http://www.grandroyal.com/talk/showthread.php?s=&postid=296454&t=3420
--# Lloyd Dunn : llATdetritus.net # The Tape-beatles and Public Works Productions : http://pwp.detritus.net/ # Photostatic Magazine Retrograde Archive : http://psrf.detritus.net/ # - - - - - - - - - - - # Address | c/o Heckovi, Veltruská 531/9, Prosek, 19000 Praha-9, CZ # Mobile | +42 0732 283 221 ---------------------------------------------------- Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body. ---------------------------------------------------- Rumori list archives & other information are at http://detritus.net/contact/rumori ----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.