Not even close for higher frequencies(above maybe 6KHz).
> which should be at least as good as CDDA. BTW, what exactly is the data
>rate for CDs? 44.1kbits/second doesn't sound right to me :^( Can anyone
>help here? I'm starting to talk out of my ass.)
44,100 samples/second * 16 bits per sample = 705600 bits per second (705.6
Kbps)
Still, you can't compare this data rate to that of mp3s. mp3s will always
lose temporal resolution. Each frame represents 1/30th of a second
regardless of bit rate. A 947364437843874637843 Kbps mp3 still can't have
the same temporal information that a wav file has. The 2 formats treat the
information completely differently. This is also contributes to why you
see a lot of improvement between say 96 and 164 Kbps, but hardly any from
maybe 192 to 320 kbps.
Mike
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.