At 11:51 AM 4/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
> My point is, i believe that if one is using someone else's word, one
>should go by their definition. If you have your own (partially or fully)
>contradictory ideas, make up your own word. Finally, if you want to talk
>about general phenomena, use a more general descriptor. In this case that
>means saying something like "sample-based composition" or "audio
>appropriation" instead of "plunderphonic music".
Ah, but even "Sample Based Composition" has been defined. Daniel Vahnke,
of Vampire Rodents and Ether Bunny, did a rather long-ish paper on the term
some many years back...so I'm told. (He never sent me a copy.) Not that
Vampire Rodents ever get noticed on this list for what they did....
JJTar.
---
Peace Hugs and Unity Jason J. Tar
W. W. J. D?
(What would Jason Do?)
http://www.msu.edu/user/tarjason
ICQAT13792120
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.