[Rumori] Songwriters Say Piracy Eats Into Their Pay
matt davignon
mattdavignon at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 7 11:38:49 PST 2004
Actually, there's another case of misleading logical arguments. If Mr.
Strouse took in $250k from royalties in 2002, the largest chunk of that was
probably from the Jay-Z song. (I imagine that sold many more copies and
received more airplay than the original Annie soundtrack that year.) That
would mean his declining royalty payments in 2003 could be explained by the
Jay-Z song not being a huge hit anymore, NOT because more people freely
downloaded it in 2003 than 2002!
>"M.Simons" <msimons at slackware.com> done wrote:
> > Mr. Strouse took in about $250,000 from recording royalties in 2002,
> > according to his publisher, Helene Blue. Last year, she said, Mr.
> > Strouse drew only about half that total, mainly because of illegal
> > downloading of various recordings containing his songs.
>
>250k for his ENTIRE catalog. Could it have been the downturn in the
>economy? Or maybe nobody was listening to his songs in 2003, or those that
>were interested had purchased the cds in 2002? A Hard Knock Life came out
>in 1998: How much play did it get in 2003? Are we to really believe that
>one derivative work would have really produced $46,000 in revenue if his
>entire catalog in a good year only produces 250k? Even if you assume
>Jay-Z and Mr. Strouse splitting the revenues (hence, $23,000/each) what is
>that? A little less than 10% of his numbers in 2002? That's an awful big
>chunk for one derivative work which was released 5 years prior.. and that
>chunk is just of alleged lost income, and doesn't include actual sales.
_________________________________________________________________
Expand your wine savvy — and get some great new recipes — at MSN Wine.
http://wine.msn.com
More information about the Rumori
mailing list