[rumori] BOUNCE rumoriatdetritus.net: Non-member submission from ["John D. Lindenbaum" <johnlatphoenix.Princeton.EDU>] (fwd)

Steev [rumori] BOUNCE rumoriatdetritus.net: Non-member submission from ["John D. Lindenbaum" <johnlatphoenix.Princeton.EDU>] (fwd)
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 23:41:18 -0800 (PST) (00920706078, Pine.LNX.4.05.9903052340210.19036-100000atflotsam.detritus.net)


bounced to me.

smh

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:20:14 -0800
From: owner-rumoriatdetritus.net
To: owner-rumoriatdetritus.net
Subject: BOUNCE rumoriatdetritus.net: Non-member submission from ["John D. Lindenbaum" <johnlatphoenix.Princeton.EDU>]
From: "John D. Lindenbaum" <johnlatphoenix.Princeton.EDU> To: rumoriatdetritus.net
Subject: questions about copyright law and sampling

I apologize in advance if this goes against list protocol.

I'm a senior at Princeton writing my thesis on copyright law for music
sampling. I'm under the impression that the case history and industry
practice of copyright for sampling is inconsistent with the Constitutional
goal of promoting the creative arts.

Does anyone have any proposals for changing copyright law concerning
sampling? What is necessary to make the law (or the pratice of it) more in
tune with actually encouraging creativity rather than maintaining
corporate label control of musical expression?

If anyone has any thoughts on this please e-mail me at johnlatprinceton.edu
or to the list if you want.

Thanks, john Lindenbaum

________________________
http://detritus.net