>->>So, I think the question now is, what kind of works might
>->>this kind of precedent NOT include?
>->
>->the precedent seems to be set for parody only... everything else is NOT
>->included.
>
>but again, as i said, what is parody?
"parody needs to mimic an original to make its point, and so has some claim
to use the creation of its victim's (or collective victims')
imagination..." - supreme court acuff rose case.
anyway, as you pointed out most music does not do that.
philo
______________________________
illegal art
http://www.detritus.net/illegalart/
______________________________
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.